Enter your total budget, up to four channels, and the CAC you see on each one. The calculator tells you exactly how to reallocate spend so your blended LTV:CAC ratio hits its highest possible value.
Channel mix optimization weights marketing spend toward the channels that return the most revenue per dollar of customer acquisition cost. Most B2B SaaS companies running at $10M to $200M ARR discover their channel mix was set by historical habit rather than efficiency math. Paid search gets the same percentage it got two years ago. Content SEO is underfunded because its CAC is harder to attribute. The optimizer surfaces these gaps by calculating each channel's efficiency score.
To improve marketing ROI through channel mix, pair this optimizer with CAC reduction strategies so you are both reallocating toward better channels and improving efficiency within each one.
Content and SEO have near-zero marginal cost per additional visitor after the initial investment, making their effective LTV:CAC among the highest of any channel on a 3-year horizon.
Well-optimized B2B SaaS Google Search campaigns with strong landing pages and negative keyword lists typically run LTV:CAC of 3-6x on gross-margin LTV.
Higher CPCs compress LinkedIn LTV:CAC, but the audience quality and ICP match justify it for enterprise ACV above $50K where deal margins are high.
Teams that rebalance channel allocation based on LTV:CAC data rather than historical habit typically improve blended CAC by 10-25% within two quarters.
Input your total monthly or quarterly marketing budget available for allocation across paid channels. This is the constraint the optimizer works within.
Enter up to four channels with the CAC you currently see on each one and the average LTV of customers acquired through that channel. Use channel-specific LTV if you have it; otherwise use company LTV as a starting point.
The optimizer ranks channels by LTV:CAC efficiency score. The channel at the top of the ranking is where the next marginal dollar should go. Channels below the threshold may be worth reducing or eliminating.
The optimizer outputs the budget amount for each channel that maximizes your blended LTV:CAC given your total budget constraint. Compare this against your current allocation to see where rebalancing would have the biggest impact.
Channel mix optimization is the process of allocating marketing budget across channels in proportion to their efficiency, measured by the revenue or LTV:CAC return per dollar spent on each. The goal is to maximize total pipeline or customer volume at the best possible blended CAC, given the constraint that each channel has a different cost structure and audience.
The optimal channel mix allocates the most budget to channels with the lowest CAC and highest LTV:CAC ratio, subject to saturation constraints. Simple optimization: rank channels by LTV:CAC efficiency, allocate maximum budget to the best channel until it saturates (CAC starts rising), then move to the next best channel. The optimizer does this math across up to four channels simultaneously.
B2B SaaS companies at $5M-$50M ARR typically see the best LTV:CAC from: content and SEO (highest LTV, lowest marginal CAC), Google Search (high intent, efficient CAC), LinkedIn (higher CAC but strongest ICP match for enterprise), and webinars/events (variable CAC but high close rates). The mix shifts toward paid as the company scales past $50M ARR and content SEO is already well-established.
LTV often varies significantly by channel because channels attract different types of customers. Enterprise buyers arriving through intent-based Google Search often have higher ACV and longer contracts than SMB buyers arriving from content. When optimizing channel mix, use channel-specific LTV not company-level average LTV or you will misallocate budget away from channels that attract your best customers.
Review channel mix monthly as the primary cadence and rebalance quarterly unless a channel's CAC shifts dramatically. Monthly reviews catch efficiency changes early. Quarterly rebalances allow enough time for algorithm learning periods after budget shifts, which typically take 2-4 weeks on Google and LinkedIn before performance stabilizes.
Hellyeah runs channel efficiency analysis continuously against live CRM and ad platform data, alerting you when a channel's LTV:CAC score crosses a threshold you set. It generates reallocation recommendations before the quarter ends, rather than surfacing the insight three weeks after the opportunity has passed.
Blended CAC averages acquisition cost across all channels and all customers. Channel CAC measures acquisition cost specifically for customers acquired through one channel. Channel mix optimization requires channel-specific CAC because blending them hides the fact that one channel might be 5x more expensive than another, which is exactly what you need to know to reallocate budget effectively.
Optimize for LTV:CAC rather than CAC alone. A channel with a $15,000 CAC but customers who average $90,000 LTV (6:1 ratio) is more efficient than a channel with $3,000 CAC and $9,000 LTV customers (3:1 ratio). Optimizing for CAC alone consistently results in underinvestment in enterprise and ABM channels that generate fewer but higher-value customers.
Hellyeah runs channel efficiency analysis continuously against live CRM and ad platform data, alerting you when a channel's LTV:CAC score crosses a threshold you set and generating reallocation recommendations before the quarter ends.