Enter your revenue target, deal size, and win rate to get a budget number you can defend to your CFO. The calculator runs both a bottom-up (leads-needed) and top-down (ARR percentage) model and shows you where the two methods agree, or where they diverge and why.
Most marketing budget conversations stall because the CMO and CFO are speaking different languages. The CFO wants a percentage of revenue. The CMO wants enough budget to hit pipeline. This calculator bridges that gap by running both models simultaneously. When both methods land in the same range, you have a number that holds up in any budget review.
To improve marketing ROI without increasing budget, the fastest path is through agentic marketing that reduces the execution cost per pipeline dollar generated, effectively increasing what your existing budget can deliver.
OpenView Partners benchmark for Series A and B SaaS companies in active growth mode targeting aggressive ARR expansion.
Companies prioritizing profitability over growth rate, or businesses with strong organic / PLG motion that reduces paid dependency.
Most B2B SaaS companies allocate the largest single channel share to Google Search, reflecting its intent-capture advantage for bottom-of-funnel demand.
Content and SEO are chronically underfunded relative to their long-term CAC advantage. Companies that invest early in content see compounding returns within 18-24 months.
Input your current ARR and next-year ARR target. The calculator runs the top-down model automatically, applying the benchmark spend percentage for your growth stage to produce a budget range.
Add your average deal size, close rate, and the percentage of pipeline that marketing sources. The calculator runs the bottom-up model, working backward from your revenue target to the budget required.
When both models agree within 20%, you have a defensible budget number. When they diverge significantly, the tool highlights which input assumption is causing the gap.
The calculator outputs your maximum cost-per-lead and a suggested channel allocation based on typical B2B SaaS channel efficiency benchmarks, adjusted for your ACV.
There are two methods. Top-down: apply a percentage of current or target ARR (typically 8-20% depending on growth stage). Bottom-up: work backward from your pipeline target using close rates, deal size, and cost-per-lead to calculate the budget required. Both should produce a number in the same range. When they diverge significantly, it signals either your pipeline model or your ARR target needs adjustment.
OpenView Partners and Keybanc benchmarks consistently show that growth-stage B2B SaaS ($5M-$50M ARR) companies spend 12-20% of ARR on sales and marketing combined. Marketing-only spend is typically 8-12% of ARR at growth stage. Conservative or profitable companies run 6-10%. Companies in aggressive expansion mode can justify 20-30% when CAC payback is under 12 months.
Bottom-up formula: Budget = (Revenue target - Organic/PLG revenue) / (ACV × Win rate × Marketing sourced pipeline %) × CPL. Top-down formula: Budget = Current ARR × Target marketing spend %. The bottom-up method is more defensible because it is grounded in specific pipeline assumptions. The top-down method is faster but requires knowing industry benchmarks for your vertical.
Allocation should follow CAC efficiency: put more budget toward channels where your cost-per-qualified-opportunity is lowest. For most B2B SaaS companies, a starting allocation is: 30-40% paid search, 20-30% content and SEO, 15-20% LinkedIn, 10-15% events and webinars, 5-10% retargeting. Adjust based on which channels are actually generating pipeline.
CPL ceiling is the maximum cost per lead you can afford given your deal size and close rate. Formula: CPL ceiling = ACV × Pipeline-to-close rate × Marketing lead-to-pipeline rate × (1 - Target CAC / ACV). If your ACV is $20,000, 25% of leads become pipeline, 30% of pipeline closes, and you want CAC below $8,000, your CPL ceiling is around $600.
Pre-product-market-fit companies spend disproportionately on marketing to find ICP. At PMF and Series A, marketing spend is often 15-25% of ARR as teams invest in demand generation. At Series B and beyond, efficiency becomes a constraint and spend normalizes to 10-15%. Late-stage public SaaS companies often run 8-12% of revenue on marketing as the model matures.
Hellyeah helps teams spend their existing marketing budget more efficiently through agentic marketing workflows, reducing the headcount required for execution. Fewer resources producing the same pipeline output effectively increases the budget available for paid channels. The competitive intelligence layer also helps pressure-test budget assumptions against market conditions.
Top-down starts with a revenue number and applies a benchmark percentage. It is fast but assumes your business performs at industry benchmarks, which may not be true. Bottom-up starts with pipeline targets and works backward through conversion rates and cost-per-lead assumptions. It is slower but produces a number grounded in your specific funnel metrics. Investors prefer the bottom-up model because it is auditable.
Hellyeah gives marketing and revenue teams the competitive intelligence and market context needed to pressure-test budget assumptions before they go into a board deck, turning the budget calculator outputs from a math exercise into an actionable plan.